Exploiting vulnerable adults is a significant ethical concern within financial advisory services. Advisors must take extra care with clients susceptible to age, illness, or diminished mental capacity. A breach of trust in these situations potentially harms the client and the advisor's reputation and could lead to legal repercussions.
As an investment adviser representative, Jane's elderly client shows diminished mental capacity. What is Jane's best course of action?
Not Correct
Correct!
Select an option above to see an explanation here.
A) Ignoring signs of a client's diminished capacity is unethical and could lead to financial exploitation of the client. B) Immediately freezing the client's account without cause could create an undue hardship for the client. C) The correct answer. Discussing concerns with a designated trusted contact person is an appropriate course of action in such a situation. D) Reporting to local law enforcement is generally a last-resort action reserved for cases where exploitation is suspected or confirmed.
Under the Model Rules of Conduct, when is an investment adviser allowed to borrow money from a client who is a vulnerable adult?
A) The client's agreement doesn't legitimize such a loan, especially if the client is a vulnerable adult. B) Promising to pay back with interest does not legitimize such a loan. C) The financial situation of the investment firm is irrelevant; it's still unethical to borrow from a vulnerable adult client. D) The correct answer. An investment adviser should not borrow money from a vulnerable adult client.
You suspect a colleague of yours is financially exploiting a vulnerable elderly client. What is the most appropriate action to take?
A) Confronting your colleague directly may escalate the situation without ensuring proper action is taken. B) Discussing the matter with the client could lead to confusion or further harm. C) The correct answer. Reporting the situation to your firm's compliance department is the best action. D) Reporting to the media could violate privacy laws and should not be considered an appropriate first step.
In a widely reported case, a renowned investment advisor targeted a wealthy widow with early signs of dementia. He manipulated her into changing her will, and investment plans to benefit him personally. The courts eventually ruled against him, returning the misappropriated funds to the rightful heirs and penalizing the advisor.
Become a Pro Member to see more questions
Example Series 65 Example Practice Question
Consider an advisor who discovers that an elderly client with diminished mental capacity has no close family. The advisor could manipulate the client into making investment decisions that disproportionately benefit the advisor. However, such exploitation would breach the advisor's fiduciary duties and could lead to legal consequences.